"Our (cell danger) theory suggests that autism happens because cells get stuck in a defensive metabolic mode and fail to talk to each other normally, which can interfere with brain development and function", said Robert Naviaux, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and co-director of the Mitochondrial and Metabolic Disease Center at UC San Diego. "We used a class of drugs that has been around for almost a century to treat other diseases to block the 'danger' signal in a mouse model, allowing cells to return to normal metabolism and restore cell communication". Clinical trial of children with autism spectrum disorder are planned for the coming year. [source: web news] Is treating symptoms the same as curing? If autism continues to exist as a problem, but the cells can communicate normally due to our intervention, are we correct to consider the patient "ok"?
(c) Philosophy WIRES - Commenting world news from philosophy's perspective...
> Main articles / Κύρια άρθρα > Limits of Science > Όρια της Επιστήμης
> Religion & Science Unification > Φιλοσοφία Επιστήμης & Θρησκείας